{"id":3142,"date":"2021-03-08T10:24:02","date_gmt":"2021-03-08T18:24:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.qualityhealth.org\/coap\/?page_id=3142"},"modified":"2021-03-08T10:24:02","modified_gmt":"2021-03-08T18:24:02","slug":"best-practices","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.qualityhealth.org\/coap\/best-practices\/","title":{"rendered":"Best Practices"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"wpb-content-wrapper\"><p>[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n<h3><span style=\"color: #00ccff;\"><strong>Cardiovascular\u00a0 Surgery<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n<p><strong><span style=\"color: #00ccff;\">Early Extubation Best Practices<\/span>,<\/strong>\u00a0presented to the\u00a0COAP Management Committee by Daniel Mumme, MD FACS,\u00a0May 2017<\/p>\n<p><b>Background:<\/b>\u00a0 Early\u00a0extubation\u00a0within COAP and STS has been defined as\u00a0extubation\u00a0&lt;6 hours after cardiac surgery.\u00a0\u00a0 The definition of &lt; 6 hours is somewhat arbitrary and early literature defined\u00a0early\u00a0extubation\u00a0with an 8-hour\u00a0cutoff.\u00a0\u00a0 Early\u00a0extubation\u00a0is an integral part fast-track post-operative cardiac surgery care, designed to help reduce health care resources while preserving optimal patient outcomes.\u00a0 Other aspects of fast-track cardiac surgical care including lower dose, faster-acting\u00a0opioid based\u00a0anesthesia, specific vent weaning protocols, and direct admission to a cardiac stepdown ward (no ICU stay) will not be covered in this review.<\/p>\n<p>Currently there are no society guidelines (STS, AATS) or consensus statements surrounding early\u00a0extubation.\u00a0\u00a0 Early\u00a0extubation\u00a0is not a portion of the STS composite rating nor the star rating system.\u00a0\u00a0Currently COAP considers early\u00a0extubation\u00a0a level II metric.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0While early\u00a0extubation\u00a0does not have long-term implications such as stroke, renal failure, or mortality, we have felt that it serves as a surrogate for the coordination of post-operative care amongst the entire surgical and ICU teams.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 There continues to be a wide variation of early\u00a0extubation\u00a0rates amongst hospitals in Washington state.\u00a0 The state average for early\u00a0extubation\u00a0is 69% (2014\u20142016).<\/p>\n<p><b>Summary of Data Behind Early\u00a0Extubation:\u00a0\u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>(See Early\u00a0Extubation\u00a0Literature for more detail on individual studies)<\/b><\/p>\n<p>\u2013There are no\u00a0society guidelines (STS, AATS) for early\u00a0extubation.<\/p>\n<p>\u2013Early\u00a0extubation\u00a0is safe as there is no difference of mortality or morbidity.<\/p>\n<p>(Silbert, Cheng,\u00a0Karaman,\u00a0\u00a0van\u00a0Mastright,\u00a0Wong\u00a0(Cochrane Review))<\/p>\n<p>\u2013Early\u00a0extubation\u00a0reduces ICU LOS.<\/p>\n<p>(Arom, Cheng, van Mastright, Wong (Cochrane Review))<\/p>\n<p>\u2013Early\u00a0extubation\u00a0may be cost effective.<\/p>\n<p>(Arom, van Mastright)<\/p>\n<p>\u2013Early\u00a0extubation\u00a0probably does not reduce overall LOS.<\/p>\n<p>(Silbert, van Magistright, Wong (Cochrane Review))<\/p>\n<p>\u2013The reintubation rate is low.<\/p>\n<p>(Arom, Cheng, Crawford, Silbert, Wong (Cochrane Review))<\/p>\n<p>\u2013Fast-track cardiac surgery can be safe when applied to select patients.<\/p>\n<p>(van Magistright, Wong (Cochrane Review), Youssefi)<\/p>\n<p>\u2013Dexmedetomidine based sedation may reduce intubation time<\/p>\n<p>(Curtis, Karaman)<\/p>\n<p>\u2014 Some data\u00a0suggests there is a\u00a0greater morbidity and mortality when\u00a0extubation\u00a0extends beyond 12 hours and that there is no difference between\u00a0extubation\u00a0&lt;6 hours and &lt;12 hours.\u00a0(Crawford)<\/p>\n<p><b>Strength of Data<\/b>:\u00a0\u00a0 The Cochrane review of 28 randomized clinical trials gave a low level of evidence to the primary outcome of mortality and the secondary outcome of morbidity.\u00a0 ICU LOS and overall LOS were downgraded to low level of evidence.\u00a0\u00a0 Some of the initial studies were performed in the 1990s and may be outdated.<\/p>\n<p><b>Tacoma General\u00a0<\/b><b>Hospital\/Pulse Heart Institute\u00a0<\/b><b>experience with improving early\u00a0extubation:<\/b><\/p>\n<p>Prior to 2015, early\u00a0extubation\u00a0rate at Tacoma General for CABG only was 47%.\u00a0\u00a0In an effort to\u00a0improve our early\u00a0extubation\u00a0times, a CABG collaborative group was created which sought\u00a0input\u00a0from all potential responsible parties.\u00a0 This group included cardiothoracic surgery, pulmonary, cardiac anesthesia, nurse manager, data manager,\u00a0quality manager,\u00a0IT\/EPIC support, respiratory therapy, physician assistant, cardiac\u00a0care line\u00a0manager, and organizational effectiveness manager.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Input\u00a0from each member of the group was sought.\u00a0 Retrospective\u00a0CABG only\u00a0data of surgeon specific ventilator times as well as anesthesiologist\u00a0and surgeon narcotic usage was obtained.\u00a0 Prospective data was collected and presented to\u00a0all\u00a0cardiac surgeons and all members of the CABG Collaborative group on a\u00a0bi-weekly basis\u00a0initially\u00a0to assess and correct problems as quickly as possible.\u00a0\u00a0Since then the meetings have spaced out to quarterly and now bi-annually.<\/p>\n<p>Various actions taken over the next few months included:<\/p>\n<p>Nursing\/RT efforts:<\/p>\n<p>\u2013Education of\u00a0Cardiac ICU\u00a0nurses of goal of early\u00a0extubation.\u00a0 Creating\u00a0a\u00a0culture of early\u00a0extubation<\/p>\n<p>\u2013Marking the 6 hour and\u00a024 hour\u00a0extubation\u00a0times on a whiteboard in the patient\u2019s ICU room to alert all members of the team<\/p>\n<p>\u2013Respiratory therapy signing out at bedside<\/p>\n<p>\u2013Rewriting the post-operative EPIC order set to include less narcotic use and encourage non-narcotic alternatives<\/p>\n<p>\u2013Creating a\u00a02 hour\u00a0post-operative \u201chuddle\u201d to decide to proceed with early\u00a0extubation<\/p>\n<p>\u2013Willingness on all members of the team to extubate patients with IABP in place<\/p>\n<p>\u2013More liberal use of pulmonary consult<\/p>\n<p>\u2013More stringent use of\u00a0extubation\u00a0protocol<\/p>\n<p>\u2013Citing which\u00a0patients did\/did not meet\u00a0extubation\u00a0mark at nursing\u00a0sign-out\u00a0of 07:00 and 19:00.<\/p>\n<p>\u2013ICU nurse to send email to surgeon and nurse manager if patient\u00a0failed the\u00a06-hour\u00a0mark.<\/p>\n<p>Data efforts:<\/p>\n<p>\u2013Attempt to create real-time data review to understand why patients were failing early\u00a0extubation<\/p>\n<p>\u2013Weekly vent reports sent out to all cardiac\u00a0surgeons, RT, nursing manager, quality manager, and cardiac ICU nurses<\/p>\n<p>\u2013Vent data reviewed at monthly Quality meeting and Coronary COE meeting<\/p>\n<p>Compensation efforts:<\/p>\n<p>\u2013Early\u00a0extubation\u00a0as one of\u00a0four metrics used for Pulse cardiac surgery quality bonus<\/p>\n<p>\u2013Early\u00a0extubation\u00a0also one of several metrics cited for LEM bonus of\u00a0Pulse administration.<\/p>\n<p>Over the past two years, early\u00a0extubation\u00a0at Tacoma General has improved for all\u00a0open heart\u00a0operations.\u00a0 In 2016, the CABG only early\u00a0extubation\u00a0rate was 79%.\u00a0\u00a0 Improvement in blood product usage,\u00a0another goal of the above collaborative, has also occurred.\u00a0\u00a0 The results have thus far been sustainable.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Attempts\u00a0to make the data analysis more real-time, actionable,\u00a0and accountable are felt to have\u00a0contributed to the improved results.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Multi-disciplinary efforts to improve\u00a0early\u00a0extubation\u00a0have created a\u00a0culture of early\u00a0extubation.<\/p>\n<p>For further questions, please contact:<\/p>\n<p>Jeannie Collins-Brandon, Program Director COAP;\u00a0<a href=\"mailto:jcollinsbrndon@qualityhealth.org\">jcollinsbrndon@qualityhealth.org<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Daniel Mumme, MD FACS Pulse Heart Institute;\u00a0<a href=\"mailto:daniel.mumme@multicare.org\">daniel.mumme@multicare.org<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #00ccff;\"><b>Reducing Post-CABG 30 Day Readmissions \u2013 Best Practices,\u00a0<\/b><\/span>presented to\u00a0COAP Management Committee by\u00a0Ryan Foresman, MD, May 2017<\/p>\n<p><b>Background<\/b>:\u00a0\u00a0CABG ranked as having the highest potentially preventable readmission rate within 15 days following discharge (13.5%)<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li data-leveltext=\"\u2022\" data-font=\"Times\" data-listid=\"2\" data-aria-posinset=\"1\" data-aria-level=\"4\">Second highest\u00a0average Medicare payment\u00a0per\u00a0readmission ($8,136)(MedPAC, 2007).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li data-leveltext=\"\u2022\" data-font=\"Times\" data-listid=\"2\" data-aria-posinset=\"1\" data-aria-level=\"4\">$151 million:\u00a0 The estimated annual cost to Medicare for potentially preventable CABG readmissions<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>CMS update 2017<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li data-leveltext=\"\u2022\" data-font=\"Times New Roman\" data-listid=\"3\" data-aria-posinset=\"2\" data-aria-level=\"4\">Penalties for &lt;30 day readmission following CABG<\/li>\n<li data-leveltext=\"\u2022\" data-font=\"Times New Roman\" data-listid=\"3\" data-aria-posinset=\"3\" data-aria-level=\"4\">It is projected that penalties for total readmissions will increase to $528 million in 2017, $108 million more than in 2016.<\/li>\n<li data-leveltext=\"\u2022\" data-font=\"Times New Roman\" data-listid=\"3\" data-aria-posinset=\"4\" data-aria-level=\"4\">HRRP (Hospital Readmission Reduction Program) hospitals with readmission rates that exceed the national average are penalized by a reduction in payments across all of their Medicare admissions\u2014not just those which resulted in readmissions.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Most importantly, the significant cost to the patient both from a financial and emotional perspective cannot be dismissed.\u00a0 Although the cost to the patient is difficult to quantify, it remains undoubtedly significant.<\/p>\n<p>Unfortunately, there is a paucity of literature addressing the issue\u00a0of post-CABG\u00a030 day\u00a0readmission.<\/p>\n<p><b>Harrison Medical Center Post-CABG readmission reduction<\/b>:<\/p>\n<p>In 2016, Harrison Medical Center (HMC) was able to decrease post-CABG 30 day readmissions to 3.6%.\u00a0 For comparison,\u00a0National Range: 12-24%, STS:<b>\u00a0<\/b>10% (2016), COAP (WA state) average: 7.9%.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Prior to 2017 HMC had post-CABG 30 day readmission rates of 16.3% in 2014 and 8.9% in 2015.\u00a0 In an effort to significantly reduce our\u00a0readmission rates several\u00a0key steps were taken.\u00a0 These steps are listed\u00a0below along with how each step was addressed.<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li data-leveltext=\"%3.\" data-font=\"Times\" data-listid=\"5\" data-aria-posinset=\"1\" data-aria-level=\"3\"><b>Identification of patients with greatest risk of readmission<\/b><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>According to\u00a0STS\u00a0 the\u00a0most frequent causes of readmission are fluid overload (often presenting as pleural effusion) 23%, infection 20%, and arrhythmia (most commonly atrial fibrillation) 8%.<\/p>\n<p>According to\u00a0NIH \/ CIHR Cardiothoracic Surgical Trials Network the patients most at risk for readmission are female gender, diabetes mellitus, COPD, elevated creatinine, low hemoglobin, long duration of surgery (<i>Ann\u00a0<\/i><i>Thorac<\/i><i>\u00a0Surg<\/i>. 2014 October ; 98(4): 1274\u20131280.).<\/p>\n<p>Once we understood which patients pose the risk, the following steps were taken; incorporating a full-time heart failure ARNP, direct surgical team involvement with optimizing patients in preoperative acute heart failure, and early establishment of true baseline weight as a goal for discharge.<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li data-leveltext=\"%3.\" data-font=\"Times\" data-listid=\"6\" data-aria-posinset=\"1\" data-aria-level=\"3\"><b>Teaching<\/b><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>ICU and PCU nursing education\/re-education regarding acute heart failure with focus on signs of fluid overload postoperatively.<\/p>\n<p>Patients were taught the Heart Zone tool.<\/p>\n<p>Beta blocker doses were not increased and ACE inhibitors\u00a0were\u00a0 held\u00a0until patients were close to baseline weight.<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li data-leveltext=\"%3.\" data-font=\"Times\" data-listid=\"5\" data-aria-posinset=\"2\" data-aria-level=\"3\"><b>Observation vs readmission<\/b><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Discussions with ER physician director were held to utilize observation status on some \u201creadmissions\u201d especially those that were related to heart failure or stable rhythm changes.\u00a0 This was done to allow for 24 hours of evaluation without admitting the patient.\u00a0 ED physician would then notify the surgeon on call and the surgical team then rounds on the patient the next day.<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li data-leveltext=\"%3.\" data-font=\"Times\" data-listid=\"6\" data-aria-posinset=\"2\" data-aria-level=\"3\"><b>Early post-operative follow-up<\/b>\u00a0(within 3 days post-discharge)<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>The single most important change was the\u00a0implementation of having our Advance Practice Clinicians begin\u00a0seeing patients in clinic on the 3rd day post-discharge.\u00a0 This allowed for very early recognition of heart failure symptoms, knowledge that the patients were not correctly\u00a0taking medication, and a lack of patient understanding of their recovery process.<\/p>\n<p><b>The Literature<\/b>:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li data-leveltext=\"%1.\" data-font=\"Times\" data-listid=\"7\" data-aria-posinset=\"1\" data-aria-level=\"1\"><i>Ann\u00a0<\/i><i>Thorac<\/i><i>\u00a0Surg<\/i>. 2014 Oct; 98(4): 1274\u20131280<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<ol>\n<li data-leveltext=\"%1.\" data-font=\"Times\" data-listid=\"7\" data-aria-posinset=\"2\" data-aria-level=\"1\">JAMA, 2003 Aug; 290(6): 773-780<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<ol>\n<li data-leveltext=\"%1.\" data-font=\"Times\" data-listid=\"7\" data-aria-posinset=\"3\" data-aria-level=\"1\">J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;118:823-32<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<ol>\n<li data-leveltext=\"%1.\" data-font=\"Times\" data-listid=\"7\" data-aria-posinset=\"4\" data-aria-level=\"1\">J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001 Aug;122(2):278-86<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<ol>\n<li data-leveltext=\"%1.\" data-font=\"Times\" data-listid=\"7\" data-aria-posinset=\"5\" data-aria-level=\"1\">January 26, 2016 \u2013 Scientific presentation at the 52nd Annual Meeting of<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.\u00a0John P.\u00a0Nabagiez, MD<\/p>\n<p>1,185 patients who received visits from PAs on days 2 and 5 following hospital discharge had a significantly lower rate of readmission (10%) compared to (17%). This represents a 41% reduction in the rate of readmission within the first 30 days following cardiac surgery. It cost\u00a0$23,500 to make house calls to 363 patients, which saved $977,500 in readmission costs.<\/p>\n<p>This translated to $39 in healthcare savings for every $1 spent.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n<h3><span style=\"color: #00ccff;\"><strong>Interventional Cardiology\u00a0<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n<p><b><span style=\"color: #00ccff;\">Transradial Access for Coronary Angiography Best Practices<\/span>,<\/b>\u00a0<em>presented to the COAP Management Committee by Kim Koegel, MN, RN, CNML, clinical nurse manager; Sunil Rao, MD, FSCAI, technical advisor; Peter Krebs,\u00a0ARRT, cath lab supervisor; Chris Anderson, ARRT,\u00a0cath\u00a0lab tech. June \u00a02017\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Transradial\u00a0access for coronary angiography can help a\u00a0cath\u00a0lab\u2019s progress towards achieving triple aim goals.\u00a0 Improved quality, reduced cost and improved patient satisfaction are seen in\u00a0cath\u00a0labs with a high degree of\u00a0transradial\u00a0access.\u00a0 Quality is improved through reduced bleeding and vascular access site complications.\u00a0 Cost is reduced through decreased length of stay and utilization of hospital resources.\u00a0 Patients who have experienced transfemoral and\u00a0transradial\u00a0prefer\u00a0transradial\u00a0due to increased mobility and function and decreased discomfort.<\/p>\n<p>There are several keys to starting a\u00a0transradial\u00a0program that are integral to success.\u00a0\u00a0 First is having a physician champion.\u00a0 Just like any change process there are early adopters and late adopters when starting up a\u00a0transradial\u00a0program.\u00a0 Having a physician champion that can speak with peers about concerns and can offer guidance and support during the training period is helpful to the overall successful adoption of a\u00a0transradial\u00a0program.<\/p>\n<p>Recently there have been\u00a0increases\u00a0in observational and randomized control studies that help establish best practice for\u00a0transradial\u00a0programs.\u00a0 The Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention (SCAI) put forth a consensus report on best practice for\u00a0transradial\u00a0programs.\u00a0\u00a0The consensus recommendations include (a) adequate anticoagulation during\u00a0transradial\u00a0procedures; (b) use of\u00a0low profile\u00a0system catheters; and (c) patent hemostasis technique when removing the sheath (1).<\/p>\n<p>Adequate anticoagulation during the procedure:<br \/>\nAdequate procedural anticoagulation reduces the risk of radial artery thrombosis and occlusion.\u00a0\u00a0 Heparin can be given intravenous or intra-arterial and is cost effective.\u00a0 Bivalirudin and low molecular weight heparin may also be considered.<\/p>\n<p>Use of\u00a0low profile\u00a0catheters:<br \/>\nChoosing the lowest profile catheter that will allow good imaging is another important measure to reducing the risk of radial artery occlusion\/injury.\u00a0\u00a0Use of 5-French or 6-French introducing sheaths that have a tapered tip and are hydrophilic have been shown to create less vascular trauma and potentially better long-term radial artery patency (2).<\/p>\n<p>Patent hemostasis technique when removing the sheath:<br \/>\nThere have been many trials and observational studies that have demonstrated statistically significant reductions in bleeding and access site complications when using the\u00a0transradial\u00a0approach (2).\u00a0 The radial\u00a0artery\u00a0is easily\u00a0compressed\u00a0and there is collateral circulation to the\u00a0hand\u00a0from the ulnar artery.\u00a0 SCAI\u00a0recommends\u00a0patent hemostasis technique using a hemostatic compression device\u00a0(1).\u00a0 A radial artery compression device is inflated to just past pulsatile bleeding.\u00a0 After remaining inflated for two hours post procedure\u00a0the air is removed from the compression device according to the manufacturer guidelines.<\/p>\n<p>Other considerations when establishing a\u00a0transradial\u00a0access program:<\/p>\n<p>Radiation exposure:\u00a0 During the learning curve phase there is an increased radiation exposure to physicians.\u00a0 To help mitigate this several things can be done.\u00a0 Position the patient with the arm next to the torso.\u00a0 Use a radiolucent arm board to help position the patient\u00a0with arm to the side.\u00a0 The board can be articulated\u00a0at an angle\u00a0to the table to allow radial artery cannulation and then moved parallel to the body to allow better positioning of the lead shielding.\u00a0\u00a0For left radial access you can bring the arm across the body after radial access and support with pillows, bath blankets, or gel molds.\u00a0 This allows the physician and scrub tech to stand in usual positions tableside.\u00a0\u00a0Using extension tubing to increase the distance from the image intensifier to the\u00a0manifold\u00a0is another\u00a0way to decrease radiation exposure.\u00a0 Once providers have become proficient in the\u00a0transradial\u00a0technique radiation exposure significantly reduces.<\/p>\n<p>Clearly established standards of care and\u00a0team training:\u00a0 Having a clearly defined\u00a0transradial\u00a0standard of care\u00a0that the team is well versed on\u00a0will reduce early confusion among team members when establishing a\u00a0transradial\u00a0program.\u00a0 Things to consider are patient selection, appropriate positioning, establishing IV access away from the distal part of the arm being used for radial access, and spasmolytic therapy. Patient selection\u00a0includes consideration of hemodynamic stability, age, prior\u00a0transradial\u00a0procedures, planned dialysis access in the extremity and potential need for bypass graft surgery.\u00a0 Previously it was thought the ideal\u00a0transradial\u00a0patient was less than 70 years and had\u00a0a\u00a0simple coronary lesion.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Newer studies show that\u00a0transradial\u00a0access is feasible in older patients, as well as those with complex lesions, bypass grafts, and difficult coronary anatomy (3).<\/p>\n<p>Patient positioning\u00a0to reduce radiation exposure\u00a0was discussed earlier.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0It is helpful in the ordering template to have the provider indicate\u00a0transradial\u00a0or trans femoral access so the team can have the patient appropriately positioned for the procedure and to reduce waste in supplies picked for the case.\u00a0 Early in the development of a\u00a0transradial\u00a0program it is advised to prep both radial and femoral sites to ease the transition to femoral access if the radial site is unable to be accessed.\u00a0 Communicating proper IV placement\u00a0to the prep and recovery team\u00a0will\u00a0allow ease of access\u00a0to the IV line\u00a0during the procedure and not impede IV infusions when the radial access hemostatic device is inflated post procedure.\u00a0 Letting the ED know about proper IV site placement is important when starting radial access for STEMI.<\/p>\n<p>Another standard of care consideration is the prophylactic use of spasmolytic therapy.\u00a0 Calcium channel blockers (verapamil\u00a0or nicardipine) and\/or nitrates (nitroglycerin) are typically used right after radial artery access to reduce arterial spasm\u00a0(2).\u00a0 This will reduce the potential for vascular trauma during catheter manipulation.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Recent attention has been given to spasmolytic therapy at the end of the procedure before the sheath is removed (4).\u00a0 Use of nitroglycerin at the end of the procedure was shown to decrease the incidence of radial artery occlusion, thus preserving the site for possible future use in the setting of bypass surgery.<\/p>\n<p>Special considerations for radial access and STEMI:<\/p>\n<p>Transradial\u00a0access for STEMI should not be considered until the team is well accustomed to doing this with elective procedures.\u00a0 SCAI recommendation is at least 100 elective PCI procedures using the\u00a0transradial\u00a0approach\u00a0(1).\u00a0 Both radial and femoral sites should be prepped and a pre-determined time limit for when to switch to femoral access if radial access is difficult to achieve are beneficial towards keeping door to balloon times down.\u00a0 The\u00a0cath\u00a0program should monitor door to balloon time to prevent it from creeping up and allow timely correction if needed.<\/p>\n<p>There is growing preference for\u00a0transradial\u00a0approach across the nation.\u00a0 The reduced risk of complications and improved patient satisfaction are among the top reasons for this.\u00a0 The COAP database has shown a steady rise in the use of\u00a0transradial\u00a0access, increasing from just 3.5% in 2012 to 31.7% in 2016.\u00a0 Taking advantage of the lesions learned from centers that have higher\u00a0transradial\u00a0access for diagnostic and interventional cardiac cases can help new programs with a sound foundation to launch their own program.<\/p>\n<p>Page Break<\/p>\n<p>REFERENCES<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li data-leveltext=\"%1.\" data-font=\"\" data-listid=\"1\" data-aria-posinset=\"1\" data-aria-level=\"1\">\u00a0Rao SV, Tremmel JA, Gilchrist IC, et al.\u00a0 Best practices for\u00a0transradial\u00a0angiography and intervention: A consensus statement from the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention\u2019s\u00a0Transradial\u00a0working group.\u00a0 Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 2014; 83:228-236.<\/li>\n<li>Caputo RP, Tremmel JA, Rao S, et al.\u00a0\u00a0Transradial\u00a0arterial access for coronary and peripheral procedures: Executive summary by the\u00a0Transradial\u00a0Committee of the SCAI.\u00a0 Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 2011; 78:823-839.<\/li>\n<li>Amin AP, Patterson M, House JA, et al.\u00a0 Costs associated with access site and same-day discharge among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention:\u00a0 An evaluation of the current percutaneous coronary intervention care pathways in the United States.\u00a0\u00a0JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions 2017; 10:324-351.<\/li>\n<li>Dharma, S., Kedev, S., Patel, T., Kiemeneij, F. and Gilchrist, I. C. A novel approach to reduce radial artery occlusion after\u00a0transradial\u00a0catheterization: Postprocedural\/prehemostasis\u00a0intra-arterial nitroglycerin.\u00a0Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 2015;<span data-contrast=\"none\">\u00a085: 818\u2013825.\u00a0<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;134233279&quot;:true,&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335559739&quot;:200,&quot;335559740&quot;:276}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row]<\/p>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text] Cardiovascular\u00a0 Surgery Early Extubation Best Practices,\u00a0presented to the\u00a0COAP Management Committee by Daniel Mumme, MD FACS,\u00a0May 2017 Background:\u00a0 Early\u00a0extubation\u00a0within COAP and STS has been defined as\u00a0extubation\u00a0&lt;6 hours after cardiac surgery.\u00a0\u00a0 The definition of &lt; 6 hours is somewhat arbitrary and early literature defined\u00a0early\u00a0extubation\u00a0with an 8-hour\u00a0cutoff.\u00a0\u00a0 Early\u00a0extubation\u00a0is an integral part fast-track post-operative cardiac surgery care, designed&#8230;","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-3142","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.qualityhealth.org\/coap\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3142","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.qualityhealth.org\/coap\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.qualityhealth.org\/coap\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.qualityhealth.org\/coap\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.qualityhealth.org\/coap\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3142"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.qualityhealth.org\/coap\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3142\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3143,"href":"https:\/\/www.qualityhealth.org\/coap\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3142\/revisions\/3143"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.qualityhealth.org\/coap\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3142"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}