Foundation Program Sites

The WPSC Speak-Up! Award

Congratulations Fall/Winter 2023 Award Recipients

Individual award: Vanna Staver, RN at the University of Washington Medical Center – Northwest prevented what could have been permanent harm from a wrong site surgery.

Team award: Infusion Center Team, Valley Medical Center – Stopping The Line when there is a patient concern, re-assessment of the situation, speaking up, and intervening to prevent patient harm prevented medication errors.

 

All nominations are submitted through this on-line form
Next nomination deadline is May 3, 2024

Did you know that seeing a problem and speaking up about it before it does harm, or as some like to call a “good catch”, is a strong indicator of a positive organizational culture of safety?

The Washington Patient Safety Coalition (WPSC) Speak-Up! Award is a statewide recognition program to celebrate individuals and teams at Washington healthcare organizations who voice their concerns to keep patients and staff safe.

When someone or a team is nominated for this award they did the right thing for patients and staff and their actions serve as a model to others.

The WPSC Speak-Up! Award is open to individuals and teams from any Washington healthcare organization from hospitals to pharmacies.

If you are interested in how speaking up and awards like this can make a difference please read Adam Novak’s article “Improving safety through speaking up: An ethical and financial imperative.” in the Journal of Health Care Risk Management, Vol 39, No. 1.

We want to thank the Michigan Health & Hospital Association Keystone Center PSO and the Virginia Hospital and Healthcare Association for their support. This program is modeled after similar awards in Michigan, Virginia, and Minnesota.

Award Deadlines

There are three 2024 Awards

Nomination due dates are:
– May 3, 2024
– August 30, 2024
– December 27, 2024

Nomination Information

 

  • Nominations are submitted via the Nomination Form button on this page.
  • Please omit any Protected Health Information.
  • Nominations should be for events within the past 12 months.
  • This is an award for clinical and non-clinical team members. Nominations are for submitted by a person from a healthcare organization on behalf of the person or people who made a good catch or spoke up. They may be staff or a patient/resident/family member or a combination of all.
  • The WPSC Speak-Up! Award is open to individuals and teams from any Washington healthcare organization, such as hospitals, pharmacies, long term care (e.g. skilled nursing facilities & assisted living facilities), clinics and physician offices to name some examples.
  • You can nominate the same individual or team multiple times, but it must be for a different event.
  • There is a limit of one award finalist per facility, per award cycle. All organizations and staff are still encouraged to nominate as many individuals as they would like, however, only one nominee will move into the finalist pool per award cycle.
  • Application and supplementary materials provided during the nomination process will not be returned.
  • Please check submissions for completion and eligibility. Any submissions with issues are replied to as not accepted with an explanation.

Below are examples of completed nomination forms. They include all questions in the form.

Its important to use the last question, which is a short description of the event, to elaborate on your responses to the other questions. For example: Why wouldn’t somebody else have caught this? Why would someone remain silent? What barriers to speaking up exist in the organization? What changes did the organization make?

Example 1

Organization Name General Hospital
Organization Address 705 2nd, Seattle, WA 98101
Nominator Name Stan Smith
Nominator Organizational Email ssmith@gh.org
Nominator Title/Position MHA RNBN, PSO
Nominator Phone 206-555-1212
Nominee Name(s) Sarah Wright
Nominee Organizational Email(s) swright24@gh.org
Nominee Title/Position(s) RN, Oncology
Nominee Phone 206-555-1212 X113
What type of adverse event or error was prevented? i.e. medication error, fall, etc. Medication Error; Inappropriate Treatment
If the nominee(s) hadn’t spoken up, what is the likelihood that this could have ended as a “near miss”? Unlikely
If the nominee(s) hadn’t spoken up, do you think that somebody else may have caught this? Unlikely
If the nominee(s) hadn’t spoken up, what is the likelihood that the patient/resident/staff would have incurred permanent damage? Likely
If the nominee(s) hadn’t spoken up, what is the likelihood that the patient/resident/staff could have died? I’m Not Sure
Was the decision to speak up spontaneous or premeditated? Spontaneous
Would it have been easy to have remained silent? No
Did the nominee(s) encounter barriers to speaking up (such as somebody brushing off their concern)? No
Was the patient, resident, family or representative informed of the concern? Yes
Did the organization  make any changes as a result of speaking up? No
Please include as much anecdotal information below that you are comfortable disclosing about the event (please omit protected health information):

This event involves a situation where an order was placed for Irradiated Packed Red Blood Cells (PRBCs) for an oncology patient, but what arrived at the bedside were non-irradiated PRBCs. Through investigation, it was found that a number of “Swiss-cheese holes” led to the wrong blood product arriving at bedside.

Thanks to RNs commitment to patient safety, her actions prevented an immunocompromised patient receiving a product that could have put them at risk for a rare but serious complication (transfusion-related­graft-versus-host disease). The RN identified that the PRBCs were not irradiated, through paying attention to detail (STAR: Stop Think Act Review). She spoke up for safety by contacting transfusion services to raise concern about the blood product delivered (CUS: Concern; Uncomfortable; Stop).

The patient and family was informed of the of the event and an apology was issued as well as how the organization will investigate and make changes to the process.

The end result of the RN speaking up was a new order process that was implemented throughout the health system.

Example 2

Organization Name Infusion Specialists, Inc.
Organization Address 705 2nd, Seattle, WA 98101
Nominator Name Lisa Lu
Nominator Organizational Email llu22@isi.org
Nominator Title/Position Safety and quality analyst
Nominator Phone 206-555-1212
Nominee Name(s) Infusion Team
Nominee Organizational Email(s) fmarks@isi.org
Nominee Title/Position(s) Team Lead, RN PCA PAA HUC
Nominee Phone 206-555-1215
What type of adverse event or error was prevented? i.e. medication error, fall, etc. Medication order, dosing, administration, treatment error
If the nominee(s) hadn’t spoken up, what is the likelihood that this could have ended as a “near miss”? Very Likely
If the nominee(s) hadn’t spoken up, do you think that somebody else may have caught this? No
If the nominee(s) hadn’t spoken up, what is the likelihood that the patient/resident/staff would have incurred permanent damage? Very Likely
If the nominee(s) hadn’t spoken up, what is the likelihood that the patient/resident/staff could have died? Very Likely
Was the decision to speak up spontaneous or premeditated? Spontaneous
Would it have been easy to have remained silent? Yes
Did the nominee(s) encounter barriers to speaking up (such as somebody brushing off their concern)? Yes
Was the patient, resident, family or representative informed of the concern? Yes
Did the organization  make any changes as a result of speaking up? Yes
Please include as much anecdotal information below that you are comfortable disclosing about the event (please omit protected health information):

I would like to respectfully nominate the Infusion Team for The Washington Patient Safety Coalition (WPSC) Speak-Up! Award. The Infusion team cares and administers treatments for patients who need outpatient intravenous therapies such as chemotherapies, immunotherapies, blood transfusions, IV fluids, antibiotics, and a lot of other specialty medications via intravenous, subcutaneous, or intramuscular routes. Staff cares for 80-90 patients daily in this fast-paced, complex department. From the front desk staff, patient care assistants, nurses, and leadership, all members of the Infusion Team go above and beyond the care of patients every day.

There have been several near misses that saved a patient’s life because of the whole teams’ dedication and commitment to patient safety and patient care.

1. Medication order error.
Two different orders for iron dextran (Infed) 975mg/500mL and iron sucrose (Venofer) 300mg/100mL were released around the same time. Upon receiving both dark-red iron products, the RN (who was taking care of both patients) noticed that the label for iron sucrose (Venofer) 300mg/100mL was affixed to the 500mL IVPB, and the label for iron dextran (Infed) 975mg/500mL was affixed to the 100mL IVPB. The RN stopped the line due to the mismatched total volume when compared to the label and sent back both products to pharmacy. The correct products were re- dispensed with the correct labels and both patients received the correct medications as ordered. Relying solely on barcode scanning the patient’s specific label would not have caught this mix-up. In addition, the patient who was ordered the Venofer had a previous drug reaction to Infed in the past. This prevented a severe adverse reaction. Kudos to RN who spoke up and stopped the line to ensure the patient received the correct medication and averted harm. Because of this event, compliance of mixing one medication at a time in the IV room has been re-enforced.

2. Medication dosing error.
Order for Zometa 4mg released at 1427 and verified by pharmacy right away. However, Zometa dose adjustment was not done for CrCl 45. Pharmacy sent 4mg (for CrCl > 60) instead of 3.3 mg (for CrCl 40-49). Product returned and new order entered for 3.3mg (entered at 1432 and verified at 1435). However, after one hour pharmacy reports correct dose is sent an hour ago. Dose was missing. Prep started for the 3.3mg dose at 1521 and dose finally administered at 1642. -– Near miss, no harm to patient, patient care was delayed but correct dose was given. RN’s are vigilant in checking CrCl and dosing for this drug. The dose of Zometa that was verified by pharmacist was 4 mg. However, based on patient’s CrCl that was calculated by this RN, the dose should be adjusted to 3.3 mg. Patient also has history of CKD. This RN called pharmacy and spoke to a pharmacist. The pharmacist on the phone asked RN to adjust the dose. This RN explained that the dose needs to be adjusted by pharmacist based on the pt’s CrCl per protocol. 4mg would be an incorrect dose for pt. Pharmacist changed the dose to the correct dose.- Near miss, averted severe harm to patient due to history of CKD, treatment given with correct dose.

3. Advocating for Patient Safety
Patient received chemotherapy via peripheral line as provider did not order port placement prior to chemotherapy. During infusion, patient complained of “hot needle” on IV site. In the following days, developed severe pain, redness, swelling, and blistering of the skin on the right arm, requiring a course of antibiotics, and an increase in the opioid dose that she was already taking (from 8 tablets of hydrocodone-acetaminophen 10-325mg, to 12 tablets a day). This did not resolve until several weeks later. This resulted in her chemo delay for the following cycles. This situation and others of the same nature resulted in change in process discussions requiring central line request for access prior to chemotherapy especially for irritants or vesicants. This will prevent irreversible harm to patients.

4. Advocating for Patient Safety
RN had 18 patients, several of the patients scheduled needed further intervention. Even though the RN had a tight schedule, she took her time to listen and intervene on patient’s reports of pain and addressed their needs. This act prevented potential harm to patient. One of the patients was only scheduled for port flush. Upon listening to patient symptoms, RN asked the ordering provider for a doppler study, patient stayed for additional 2 hours- this patient ended up in ED and admitted, prevented pulmonary embolism, interventions given in the hospital, prevented patient harm.

These few examples and many others are testament to the Infusion Teams’ daily show of dedication, pride, and commitment to patient care and patient safety. This Team embodies excellent teamwork and accountability, especially in challenging situations. The strength of this team is not just in individual members. The strength of each member IS the team! Together, they make a difference by speaking up and preventing patient harm.

Evaluation Process

All nominations will be reviewed by WPSC staff and a committee of patient safety and quality improvement leaders and patient advocates. All nominations are deidentified before going to the committee.

  • The first step is for WPSC staff to evaluate the completeness of the nomination form, the nature of the event and the impact of the prevented adverse event or error. There are a total of 33 points, out of 103, in step 1. If a nomination advances to step 2, the nominator may be asked to provide additional information.
  • Each nomination advancing to step 2 is considered a finalist and will receive a notification email and recognition.
  • In the second step, the committee will judge each finalist using the following criteria in addition to evaluating applications and supplemental nomination materials for a total of 70 points out of 103.
    • Severity of the prevented adverse event
    • Magnitude of the decision to speak-up
    • Level of difficulty of speaking-up
    • Effect of speaking-up on the organization
  • Based on the total points accumulated the committee will select the Speak-Up! Award winner(s). Yes, the committee has the discretion to award more than 1 winner per award period.

Award Presentation

  • All award recipients will be notified individually.
  • All nominees are congratulated and receive recognition through the WPSC’s website and patient safety newsletter. Finalists and award winners will receive recognition at the annual NW Patient Safety Conference. Award recipients will receive free registration to the conference. If approved by the awardee’s organization, the WPSC will arrange for an onsite recognition event.
  • The WPSC may publish the nominee’s name if selected as a finalist. Please email WPSC@qualityhealth.org if you would not like your name shared.

Award Winners

December 2, 2023
Award Recipients

Individual award: Vanna Staver, RN at the University of Washington Medical CenterNorthwest prevented what could have been permanent harm from a wrong site surgery. Speaking up for safety, especially in the operating room where authority gradient can be apparent, takes courage and is supported by the Northwest’s psychologically safe work culture. Because of Vanna’s speaking up for safety, the organization has identified opportunities related to surgical site marking standards and implemented quality improvement changes to ensure the process is reliable and safe, every time.

Team award: Infusion Center Team, Valley Medical Center – Stopping The Line when there is a patient concern, re-assessment of the situation, speaking up, and intervening to prevent patient harm prevented medication errors. From the front desk staff, patient care assistants, nurses, and leadership, all members of the Infusion Team embody excellent teamwork and accountability, especially in challenging situations. Speaking up resulted in greater collaboration with ordering providers leading to improved trust between providers and nurses.

Finalists

  • Michelle Bunikis, OR Staff Nurse – University of Washington Medical Center
  • Holy Ige, RT; Zeek Lebbie, CAN; Adam Alhassan, Security – Kindred Hospital
  • Meaza Woldemichael, Nurse – Kindred Hospital
  • Suhair Hamza, Nurse – Kindred Hospital
  • Nicholas Anderson – University of Washington Medical Center

May 31, 2023 Award
Award Recipient

Dani Morton, OB Surgical Technologist, University of Washington Medical Center, for preventing an unintentional retained foreign object through professional persistence.

Finalists

  • Rajani M. Ward, Gynecological Oncology RN, Swedish Cancer Institute
  • Miranda Todd, RN, Harborview Medical Center
  • Joshua Gothberg, Pharmacy Tech A, Multicare Healthcare System
  • Scott VanHorn, Pharmacist Supervisor, NorthStar Lodge, Multicare Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital

December 2, 2022 Award
Award Recipient

  • Julia Ganey, Clinical Staff Pharmacist, Providence Swedish Cherry Hill Campus, for speaking up to identify areas of improvement in the identification and treatment of heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) that resulted in multi-disciplinary education and changes in workflow.

Finalists

  • Jennifer Legg, Inpatient Pharmacy Manager & Inpatient Pharmacists, Providence Swedish Edmonds Medical Center
  • Lynne Freeman, Family Medicine, Valley Medical Center
  • Karol Draeger, Admitting Registrar, Valley Medical Center
  • Shannon Gaskin and Freddy Ruiz, Molecular FISH laboratory technicians, CellNetix Pathology and Laboratories

July 8, 2022 Award
Award Recipients

  • Nursing Team on 8EH – Burns, Plastics & Pediatric Trauma Acute Care Unit at Harborview Medical Center (HMC), for continuing their commitment to ensure integration of medical interpreters in clinical activities.
  • ICU/Tele Team, Swedish Issaquah Medical Center, for preventing potential overdoses due to drug ingestion involving patients in possession of illegal substances and outside medications.

Finalists

  • Barbara Brenneman, Pharmacist, Swedish Medical Services
  • Hannah Baldwin, Occupational Therapist, Swedish Health Services
  • Ian Geiger, RN and Young Mi Murphy, RN, Ambulatory Surgery, Swedish Health Services
  • ICU/Tele Team, (RNs/NACs/MTs/HUCs), Swedish Issaquah Medical Center
  • Jolene Silzell, Grossing technician, CellNetix Laboratories and Pathology
  • Katy Brehe, RN2- Trama Surgical ICU, Harborview Medical Center
  • Nursing Team on 8EH – Burns, Plastics & Pediatric Trauma Acute Care Unit, Harborview Medical Center
  • Roz Parsons, Nurse Manager, Valley Medical Center
  • Sajar Camara, PET CT Technologist, Swedish Health Services

Frequently Asked Questions

Who can be nominated?

The WPSC Speak-Up! Award is open to clinical and non-clinical staff. Nominees may be individuals or teams from any Washington healthcare organization, such as hospitals, pharmacies, long term care (e.g. skilled nursing facilities & assisted living facilities), clinics and physician offices to name some examples. This award is founded on the principle of transdisciplinary teamwork; everyone has the right to be concerned and everyone has the right to speak up.

Can I nominate myself?

Yes, you may nominate yourself, though we will require another contact at your facility to verify the authenticity of the event.

Can patients, residents and families be nominated?

Not at this time. This award is focused on acknowledging the efforts of healthcare staff. However, the roles of patients, residents and families may be acknowledged and part of the narrative.

How many times can I nominate an individual or team?

You can nominate the same individual or team multiple times, but it must be for a different event. If two nominations are submitted for the same event, we will reach out to the contacts listed in the nomination forms to work with each nominator.

Is there a limit on the number of nominees from each organization?

There will be a limit of one award finalist per organization, per period. All organizations and staff are still encouraged to nominate as many individuals as they would like, though only one nominee will move into the finalist pool per period.

Can a nominee receive this award even if information about the event is withheld?

Yes, though we do encourage you to submit as much information as possible, we realize that certain information is sensitive.

How old can the good catch or event described in the nomination be?

Nominations are for events no older than 12 months.

Will any of our information be published?

We would like to share your Speak-Up! story in a de-identified manner if possible, but will always respect the wishes of you and your organization. None of the details of the event within your nomination form will be published unless otherwise approved by both you and your organization.