Patient safety is a critical issue in medicine today. There is, rightly, a strong emphasis on systems approaches to improving medical care and decreasing error. However, medicine is fundamentally a human endeavor. Without attention to the human aspects of the medical enterprise—emotions, cognitive abilities, biases, communication—crucial aspects of patient safety will remain beyond our grasp.

Learning objectives:

1. Describe how the culture of medicine can endanger the health and safety of patients.
2. Explain the role of emotions, cognition, and communication regarding medical error.
3. Identify opportunities to improve the delivery of care while navigating an imperfect health care environment.
    

Please note that Danielle Ofri does not use Power Point in her lectures. Technical requirements are only a microphone and a cup of tea.

Most diagnostic errors are associated with issues in bedside diagnostic reasoning and appear to disproportionately reflect failures of clinical expertise, which has the potential to be addressed by AI. Before us lie two possible paths: one in which AI promotes diagnostic excellence and the other in which AI promotes efficiency but sacrifices quality and safety. In this session, we will explore what it will take to achieve the more desirable future—a world where diagnoses are accurate, timely, and effectively communicated to patients, avoiding both diagnostic error and overdiagnosis… one where diagnostic processes are patient-centered, evidence-based, prompt, efficient, safe, and equitable. 

Learning objectives:

1. Summarize public health burden & financial impact of diagnostic errors and misdiagnosis-related harms.
2. Discuss potential pitfalls of applying artificial intelligence (AI) for clinical diagnosis without adequate guardrails.
3. Describe prerequisites and systems of care essential to deploying AI to achieve diagnostic excellence.

Trust is assumed to be a pre-requisite for patients. However, trust may not sit comfortably with our concepts and practices in risk management, the actual experience of harm and the rocky recovery after harm. Carolyn Canfield will lead this discussion drawing on trust as a throughline in her personal experience with harm, her exploration of system resilience and restorative justice, and a decade of teaching patient safety to medical students.

Leaning objectives:

1. Explain how relationship-building with patients can affect the safety of care and management of risk.
2. Compose “What’s One Thing…?” questions to open trust-building conversations and learn patient priorities.
3. Apply a “Social Determinants of Trust” lens on building foundations for trust with patients, right from the start.

The presentation discusses ethical and legal challenges around artificial intelligence implementation in health care using various types of AI software designs and cutting-edge AI-related health care applications as examples.

Learning objectives:

1. Define artificial intelligence
2. Recognize opportunities around how AI can improve health care service delivery
3. Recognize potential ethical and legal threats around AI implementation

The detrimental impact of workplace incivility is well documented, and if allowed to take root, the consequences can be serious. So, imagine an enjoyable workplace—an environment where you and your colleagues can truly thrive in your career and profession. This engaging and thought-provoking session provides a deepened and empirical understanding of workplace incivility, its impact on individuals, teams, organizations, and patient care—and emphasizes ways to build and sustain healthy work environments. Join a renowned nurse researcher, award-winning professor, and accomplished author for a stimulating session to explore best practices to foster healthy, vibrant work environments.

Learning objectives:

1. Explore the State of the Science related to civility, incivility, and other forms of workplace aggression.
2. Describe the impact of incivility on individuals, teams, organizations, and patient care.
3. Examine individual & organizational competencies to foster healthy, productive work environments.

As a society, we have failed to provide safe, reliable, person-directed care for older adults and people living with disabilities who reside in long term care facilities. We have also failed to provide safe working environments for the hundreds of thousands of people working in these facilities. It seems that even the high-profile cases don’t generate change.

Yet all the key stakeholders – state regulatory agencies, for profit and non-profit industry associations, and the providers themselves say that they are committed to improving quality and safety. So why aren’t we seeing real change? What will it take to transform this sector?

This event will outline the key drivers of low quality and safety in long term care facilities. We will look at examples of organizations that have taken an innovative staff-centered approach to quality improvement. And we will discuss what’s next. Can we salvage the systems that we have now? Or do we need new models of care? Who needs to be at the table when new ways of care are developed? How will they be regulated? Hint: there’s a role for Oregon and Washington’s patient safety commissions.

Learning objectives:

1. Understand why long term care facilities are not safe for residents or staff
2. Learn how some communities have made change
3. Become aware of the urgent need for change

Bree Collaborative and Foundation for Health Care Quality Award winners discuss how they create processes and practices that enhance equity that result in measurable changes in the access to and quality of care for patients.

Learning Objectives:

1. Understand  how collaborative care contributes to patient safety and outcomes.
2. Understand how organizations embed equity principles into best practices.
3. Understand specifics around quality improvement activities that are focused on equity.

Patient decision aids are effective interventions for supporting patients making health and healthcare decisions. Over 200 randomized controlled trials showed compared to usual care, patients who used patient decision aids had improve decision quality, improved decision making process, and increased participation in decision making. The International Patient Decision Aid Standards provide a set of quality criteria for defining criteria to ensure it is a patient decision aid, essential criteria for minimizing the risk of a biased decision, and enhancing criteria. Current research is focused on understanding best practices for implementing patient decision aids into clinical practices and health policies.

Learning objectives:

1. Understand the state of the science supporting patient decision aids
2. Recognize challenges and facilitators for implementation of patient decision aids to enhance shared decision making
3. Learn about applications in cancer screening and cardiac treatment decisions

The term “patient safety” implies keeping patients safe from medical harm. How then might we evaluate harm that derives not from human or system error but from the medical approach itself? This presentation will explore the medical management of intersex traits (atypical sex development). Physicians have been trying to “fix” intersex since the early 19th century, and they have focused on children since the 1950s. Their efforts have been largely motivated by social anxieties about homosexuality and a sense that it would be better for children to grow up with “normal-looking” genitals, a hunch that has turned out to be wrong. Many intersex adults who have endured such “normalizing” surgeries have spoken about the physical and psychological harms that resulted from these cosmetic procedures. Though it might seem risky to let children grow up without them, activists have argued that pediatric genital surgeries violate human rights. “Patient safety” in this context would mean letting children grow up with genital, hormonal, or gonadal difference until they are old enough to make decisions about their bodies for themselves.

Learning objectives:

1. The audience will learn about the historical motivations of intersex management.
2. The audience will contemplate the meaning of medical harm in the context of pediatric genital surgeries.
3. The audience will expand their understanding of patient safety when considering children’s rights.

Dr. Simmons will share the experiences of building a culture of shared decision making at Massachusetts General Hospital, with a particular focus on programs in decision aid deployment, involvement of frontline workers in identifying areas for more shared decision making support, and supporting patients to increase their engagement with robust pre-visit preparation.

Learning objectives:

1. Identify clinical areas for shared decision making at your institution
2. Describe strategies for shared decision making implementation
3. Examine possible barriers to SDM implementation at your institution and formulate strategies to overcome these barriers

This presentation addresses the issue of systemic racism in health professions education and its detrimental impact on both student experiences and patient quality and safety. Participants will gain an understanding of systemic racism, distinguish it from individual racism, and explore its historical and current manifestations within educational institutions. Through data, research findings, and real-world case studies, we will analyze the adverse effects of systemic racism on healthcare delivery, highlighting the increased risk of medical errors, health disparities, and diminished patient outcomes. The session will focus on practical solutions and strategies to mitigate these issues, including institutional changes, support systems for students, cultural competence training, and advocacy for policy reforms. Interactive elements, such as Zoom breakout discussions and case study analyses, will engage participants in reflective and solution-oriented activities.

Learning objectives:

1. Understand and Identify Systemic Racism in Health Professions Education
   By the end of this session, participants will be able to define systemic racism and distinguish it from personally mediated and internalized racism, recognize its historical and current manifestations in health professions education, and understand its impact on student experiences and healthcare delivery, with a specific emphasis on patient quality and safety.
2. Analyze the Impact of Systemic Racism on Patient Quality and Safety
   By the end of this session, participants will be able to explain how systemic racism in health professions education contributes to disparities in patient care, including increased risk of medical errors, reduced quality of care, and delayed diagnosis and treatment for marginalized groups. Participants will also engage in reflective discussions and case study analyses to identify real-world examples of these impacts.
3. Develop and Implement Strategies to Mitigate Systemic Racism and Improve Patient Outcomes
   By the end of this session, participants will be able to propose and evaluate solutions and strategies aimed at mitigating systemic racism within their institutions. These strategies will include institutional changes, support systems for students, cultural competence training, and advocacy for policy changes, all designed to enhance patient quality and safety. Participants will also commit to actionable steps they can take in their educational or professional environments to contribute to these efforts.

Overview of Leapfrog’s national hospital ratings and how they can be used by patients, purchasers, and others to make hospital care safer and higher quality

Learning objectives:

1. Participants will learn about each of Leapfrog’s national ratings programs for hospitals
2. Participants will learn about which measures are included in each of Leapfrog’s programs
3. Participants will learn how patients, purchasers, hospitals, and other can use the published ratings

The Patient Voices Network (PVN) is a community of patients, families, and caregivers who team up with health care professionals to improve health care in British Columbia. Since 2009, PVN has connected thousands of people to work together for better health care. PVN helps build strong partnerships, encourages mutual learning, and involves patients in decision-making to address health care challenges. PVN makes a difference by:
– Building Relationships
– Learning from Each Other
– Understanding Challenges and Opportunities
– Informing Decisions
Join us to hear how PVN’s collaborative approach has transformed health care in BC and learn about the exciting future of health care co-production in the province.

Learning objectives:

1. Describe at least three specific ways in which the Patient Voices Network (PVN) has connected patients, families, caregivers, and health care professionals to improve health care in British Columbia.
2. Identify and explain at least two effective strategies and provide two examples of successful knowledge sharing and partnership-building between patients and health care teams, as demonstrated by the PVN, after the workshop.
3. Develop a personal action plan that includes at least three specific steps to apply PVN’s collaborative principles to improve health care decision-making and practice in their own communities.

Although investigating patient harm events is an essential function of the job for many patient safety, risk management, and patient experience professionals, many find limited opportunities for training on this skill. This presentation will describe the role of investigative interviews in fact-finding, introduce the cognitive interviewing protocol, and offer practical advice for the investigations in healthcare settings.

Learning Objectives:

1. Describe the elements of thorough and credible investigations into patient harm events.
2. Explain the Cognitive Interviewing protocol.
3. Discuss the use of testimonial, documentary, and physical evidence to inform the analysis of patient harm events.

Hard Truths about the Long Term Care Sector: Where do we go from here?

Barbara Kohnen Adriance, MPP is the Founder and CEO of The Malden Collective, a company that provides coaching and training services for teams working in long term care facilities. She is best known for creating the LiveWell Method, a quality assurance and performance improvement method that has reached more than 158 communities nationwide. Barbara has been in the health care sector 15 years, serving previously as head of training and human centered design at CareOregon, a Medicaid managed care organization. Her company has been recognized by the Oregon Department of Human Services as a contributor to improved quality of care and quality of life through its Quality Care Fund grant program. Barbara’s first career was in international policy advocacy in Washington DC, and she has deep regional experience in Central America and Mexico. Now she lives in Portland Oregon with her husband Jim and enjoys family, backpacking, and gardening with native plants.

barbarak@maldencollective.com

A Restorative Approach to Trust and Preparing for Uncertainty

Carolyn Canfield works as a citizen-patient to expand partnership with patients and caregivers across all facets of healthcare: professional education, service design, practice improvement, policy development, research and governance. Widowed in 2008 by healthcare tragedy led her to full-time activism, earning recognition in 2014 as Canada’s first Patient Safety Champion. In the same year, Carolyn was appointed to faculty in the Department of Family Practice at the University of British Columbia. At UBC, she actively supports the Patient and Community Partnership for Education, the Innovation Support Unit, the Centre for Health Education Scholarship, the Gateway Clinic for interprofessional training in team-based primary care (opening 2025), patient safety curriculum and instruction, enriched learning environments, and medical school candidate selection and admissions policy for the Faculty of Medicine. Provincial, national and international healthcare research roles include patient partner, co-researcher, advisor, funding adjudicator and journal manuscript reviewer. In 2017 Carolyn co-founded the independent peer-led Patient Advisors Network patientadvisors.ca to develop citizen-patient capacity and leadership across Canada. Carolyn was a plenary speaker at the 2014 Northwest Patient Safety Conference.

carolyn.canfield@ubc.ca

Civility Rising! Best Practices to Inspire Healthy Work Environments

Dr. Cynthia Clark is Founder of Civility MattersTM, Professor Emeritus at Boise State University, and an award-winning professor, scholar, and author. As a clinician, she specialized in adolescent mental health, substance abuse intervention and recovery, and suicide and violence prevention. Dr. Clark’s ground-breaking work on fostering civility and healthy work environments has brought national and international attention to the controversial issues of incivility in academic and work environments around the globe. Her theory-driven interventions, empirical measurements, theoretical models, and reflective assessments provide best practices to ­­prevent, measure, and address uncivil behavior and to create healthy workplaces.

Dr. Clark is a fellow in the American Academy of Nursing, the NLN Academy of Nursing Education, and served as co-chair for the American Nurses Association Professional Panel on Incivility, Bullying, and Workplace Violence. She is a prolific researcher, presenter, author, and professional blogger. Her presentations number in the hundreds and her publications have appeared in a broad range of peer-reviewed and open-access venues. She is the recipient of numerous teaching, research, and service awards; including 3-time recipient of the Most Inspirational Professor Award, NLN Excellence in Educational Research Award, Journal of Nursing Education Christine A. Tanner Scholarly Writing Award, Nurse Educator Kathleen T. Heinrich Writing Award, Elizabeth Russell Belford Award for Excellence in Education, awarded by Sigma Theta Tau International, and the John P. McGovern Lectureship award conferred by the American Association of Colleges on Nursing. Dr. Clark has been honored as a Distinguished Scholar at 12 universities. The first edition of her book, Creating and Sustaining Civility in Nursing Education,” received 1st place honors as the 2013 AJN Book of the Year. The 2nd edition is now available. Dr. Clark’s newest book, Core Competencies of Civility for Nursing & Healthcare is a must-read for all nurses and health care professionals.

cclark@boisestate.edu

Patient decision aids to enhance shared decision making

Dr. Matlock is Assistant Professor of Medicine, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center. He is a clinician-researcher with a strong interest in medical decision making and patient-centered care. Specifically, focusing on how older and sicker adults make decisions about invasive technologies using implantable defibrillators as a model.

DANIEL.MATLOCK@CUANSCHUTZ.EDU

Opening Keynote – When We Do Harm: Medical Error and the Human Condition

Danielle Ofri, MD, PhD is a primary care internist at Bellevue Hospital, the oldest public hospital in the country. She is Founder/Editor-in-Chief of the Bellevue Literary Review, and is a clinical professor of medicine at NYU School of Medicine.

Danielle Ofri is the author of six books about life in medicine:

• When We Do Harm: A Doctor Confronts Medical Error
• What Doctors Feel: How Emotions Affect the Practice of Medicine
• Medicine in Translation
• What Patients Say; What Doctors Hear
• Incidental Findings
• Singular Intimacies: Becoming a Doctor at Bellevue

Danielle Ofri writes about medicine and the doctor-patient relationship for the New Yorker, the New York Times, the Lancet, and the New England Journal of Medicine. Her articles have also appeared in Slate Magazine, the Los Angeles Times, the Washington Post, the Atlantic, CNN and on National Public Radio. 

She was also editor of a medical textbook—The Bellevue Guide to Outpatient Medicine—which won a Best Medical Textbook award.

Her writings have been selected twice for Best American Essays and also for Best American Science Writing. She has received the McGovern Award from the American Medical Writers Association for “preeminent contributions to medical communication,” and an honorary doctorate of humane letters.

Other recent awards include:

• 2023 Guggenheim Fellowship
• 2023 Davies Memorial Award from the American College of Physicians
• 2022 National Humanism in Medicine Medal from the Gold Foundation
• 2020 Global Listening Legend Award

Danielle Ofri has given TED talks on Deconstructing Perfection and Fear: A Necessary Emotion, and has also performed stories for the Moth. She is featured in the documentaries “Why Doctors Write” and “White Coat Rebels.”

An ever-struggling student of the cello, she is slogging—ever so slowly—through all 36 movements of the Bach cello suites.

Systemic Racism in Health Professions Education and Possible Solutions: Enhancing Patient Quality and Safety

Daryl Traylor is an academic and researcher, currently serving as a faculty member at Eastern Washington University. With a background in teaching and research, he has worked in T-cell and HIV biology, HIV PrEP, and cancer biology. Daryl’s educational journey reflects his dedication to learning and the sciences, holding multiple advanced degrees and currently expanding his knowledge as a medical student, MBA-Healthcare Administration student, and DrPH student. Originally from Houston, Texas, he lived in Chandler, AZ for 16 years, following a 20-year service in the Active Duty Army, Oklahoma Army National Guard, and Oklahoma Air National Guard. Daryl now resides in San Antonio, Texas with his wife Eboni and their two cats, Loki and Thor.

dtraylor1@ewu.edu

AI for Clinical Diagnosis at the Crossroads: A Tale of Two Possible Futures

David Newman-Toker, M.D. Ph.D. is Professor of Neurology, Ophthalmology, and Otolaryngology, and is the inaugural recipient of the David Robinson Professor in Vestibular Neurology. He holds joint appointments in Emergency Medicine and Health Sciences Informatics at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, as well as in Epidemiology and Health Policy & Management at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.

Dr. Newman-Toker’s academic mission is to eliminate harms from diagnostic errors and maximize the accuracy and efficiency of diagnostic testing in clinical practice. He is as a Core Faculty member of the Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety & Quality, where he serves as Director of the Armstrong Institute Center for Diagnostic Excellence, focused on enhancing diagnostic safety, quality, and value.

Dr. Newman-Toker’s research focuses on preventing missed strokes in the emergency department and primary care, especially among patients presenting with acute, severe vertigo or dizziness. He and his collaborators have developed innovative methods to diagnose stroke through careful bedside examination of eye movements. He is now translating these innovations into clinical practice through the use of novel technologies at the point of care.

Dr. Newman-Toker’s clinical expertise is in disorders of the brainstem and cranial nerves, including visual loss, double vision, and vertigo. He serves as Director of the Division of Neuro-Visual & Vestibular Disorders. His clinical practice focuses on emergency evaluation of patients with acute vertigo and dizziness. He does not currently have an outpatient clinic practice.

Dr. Newman-Toker completed his undergraduate education at Yale University (B.S., 1991) and his medical training at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine (M.D., 1995). After completing his Neurology residency at the Massachusetts General Hospital (1999), he went on to complete fellowships in Neuro-Ophthalmology at Harvard University/Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary (2000) and in Neuro-Otology at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine (2002). He completed his doctoral training in clinical research methods at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health through the Graduate Training Program in Clinical Investigation (Ph.D., 2007).

toker@jhu.edu

Patient decision aids to enhance shared decision making

Dawn Stacey is the Vice Dean Research in the Faculty of Health Sciences of University of Ottawa, Canada. She holds a Research Chair in Knowledge Translation to Patients and is the Co-Scientific Director of the Patient Decision Aids Research Group at the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. Her research uses co-production to develop, evaluate, and implement interventions to support patients and their families to be involved in healthcare decisions. With her outstanding and continuous accomplishments in research, she has received fellowships with the Royal Society of Canada (FRSC), American Academy of Nursing (FAAN), Canadian Academy of Health Sciences (FCAHS), and the Canadian Academy of Nursing (FCAN).

Dawn Stacey <dstacey@uottawa.ca>

Elizabeth Reis, Ph.D.
Is a professor at the Macaulay Honors College at the City University of New York where she teaches courses on Medical Ethics; Reproductive Technologies; Gender, Sex, and Bioethics; and Disability Studies. She graduated from Smith College and received her Ph.D. in History at the University of California, Berkeley. Reis is the author of Bodies in Doubt: An American History of Intersex (2nd edition 2021); Damned Women: Sinners and Witches in Puritan New England; and the editor of American Sexual Histories. She has published essays in the Hastings Center Report, Bioethics Forum, Journal of American History, Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, the New York Times, and TIME Magazine. Reis is a member of the Ethics Committee at New York Presbyterian Weill Cornell Hospital and an editor of Nursing Clio, a collaborative online journal that focuses on the intersection of gender, history, and medicine. She is a former board member of interACT: Advocates for Intersex Youth and a current board member of Talia’s Voice: Projects for Patient Safety.

Living an intersex life, CBS Sunday Morning

elizabeth.reis@mhc.cuny.edu

Kelli Houston
Kelli Houston is the Chief Equity Officer for Community Health Plan of Washington (local not-for-profit, serving vulnerable members throughout the state of Washington), where she is responsible for leading DEI strategic planning and execution across the organization.  She is the chair of the statewide Equity Council and serves on several community-led committees overseeing key priorities in advancing organizations with an anti-racism approach. She comes to us with over 17 years of DEI Leadership experience across the health and human sector with emphasis on health and racial equity and ensuring that culturally diverse communities live healthier lives and receive the care they need and deserve.
kelli.houston@chpw.org

Van Chaudhari
vandna@uw.edu

Nicole Jones
nicole.jones1@uhc.com

Zandrea Harlin
zandrea.t.harlin@kp.org

Engagement Leader, Patient & Public Engagement. Jami joined Health Quality BC in February 2016, where she brings her passion for working with people to her role as an Engagement Leader. Prior to joining the Council, she led the communications and engagement strategy for the largest provider of seniors housing in British Columbia. Before that, she spent 10 years at Fraser Health leading a multidisciplinary team focused on creating healthier communities. Throughout her career, Jami has enthusiastically supported doing everything she can to draw on the richness of our collective experiences to build a health care system that works for everyone. Jami holds a Master of Arts in Professional Communication from Royal Roads University, a Bachelor of Arts in Communications from Western Washington University and is a certified trainer in Public Participation and LEAN Healthcare.

jami.brown@healthqualitybc.ca

Using Physical, Testimonial and Documentary Evidence to Investigate Patient Harm Events

Jonathan D. Stewart, JD, MSc, MS, RN, CPPS, CPHRM is a patient safety professional, healthcare risk manager, and educator. He oversees the provision of BETA Healthcare Group’s consultation, education, and risk assessment services to hospitals, healthcare facilities, and medical groups. Prior to joining BETA, Mr. Stewart served as the Patient Safety Officer for the Veterans Health Administration’s Northwest Network (VISN20). He is experienced in both administrative and adverse event investigations, and in facilitating root cause analyses. He is a past chair of the Washington Patient Safety Coalition steering committee and is a past president of the American Association of Nurse Attorneys. Mr. Stewart received his law degree from the University of Tulsa and holds master’s degrees in nursing/health policy from the University of California at San Francisco and in human factors and system safety from Lund University in Sweden.

jonathan.stewart@betahg.com

Leigh Simmons, MD, is an internal medicine physician at Massachusetts General Hospital and assistant professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School.

She is the Medical Director of the MGH Health Decision Sciences Center where she studies the use of decision aids to help patients and clinicians in the shared decision making process. Dr. Simmons develops and conducts training of physicians and staff in communication skills focused on improving decision making with patients. Her clinical practice is with the Internal Medicine Associates at Massachusetts General Hospital. In addition to her clinical and research interests, Dr. Simmons is a medical student educator and directs the internal medicine clerkship for Harvard Medical School students at Massachusetts General Hospital.

lhsimmons@mgh.harvard.edu

Missy Danforth is the Senior Vice President of Health Care Ratings at The Leapfrog Group, a Washington, DC based, not-for-profit organization representing the nation’s largest employers and purchasers of health benefits working to make great leaps forward in the safety, quality, and value of healthcare.

At Leapfrog, Ms. Danforth serves as member of Leapfrog’s senior leadership team informing Leapfrog’s strategic direction, engaging experts and stakeholders, and analyzing program results to engage purchasers and consumers and to drive safety and quality improvements. Ms. Danforth administers Leapfrog’s various measurement and public reporting activities including the Leapfrog Hospital and Ambulatory Surgery Center Surveys, the Hospital Safety Grade, Leapfrog’s Value-Based Purchasing Program, the Leapfrog’s new recognition program, which recognizes hospitals providing exceptional care for patients with diabetes, in partnership with the American Diabetes Association.

Ms. Danforth services on the governance board of Battelle’s Partnership for Quality Measurement (PQM), is the former chair of the National Quality Forum’s Consensus Standards Approval Committee (CSAC) and serves on various other national committees and technical expert panels. She is currently leading a four-year project to develop national standards for diagnostic safety and quality in hospitals.

mdanforth@leapfrog-group.org

Patient decision aids to enhance shared decision making

Dr. Moseley received his M.D. from the University of Washington. After completing an Internal Medicine residency at the University of Utah, he practiced General Internal Medicine in rural Wyoming for 15 years before returning to Washington State and joining Wenatchee Valley Medical Center (now Confluence Health). He founded their Hospitalist Service in 2002, and with this began to realize the importance of systems of care in the quest to improve care quality and outcomes. This led to a career transition into health care quality beginning in 2007. He recently retired from his position as Medical Director of Patient Safety and Risk at Confluence Health. His quality improvement work included enhancing care quality through structured team communication, fostering an organizational culture of safety, promotion of shared decision making and patient engagement, and optimizing the approach to medical errors. His engagement on the state level has included work with the Washington Patient Safety Coalition, the Washington Health Alliance, the Washington State Choosing Wisely Taskforce, the Washington State Hospital Association Patient Safety Committee, the Robert Bree Collaborative, and Communication and Resolution Program adoption.

Randal.Moseley@confluencehealth.org

Dr. Sian Tsuei (Shawn Tsu-ay) MHSc, MD, PhD, CCFP is a practicing Canadian family physician with Population Health Sciences PhD from Harvard University. He is a Clinical Assistant Professor (UBC), Adjunct Professor (SFU) and Visiting Scientist (Harvard University). He is currently a member on the Artificial Intelligence Advisory Group of the College of Family Physician of Canada. His research examines health systems change related to technologies. He is particularly interested in the how AI affects the behaviours of health care providers and patient, as well as how AI affects the provider-patient dynamics. His research is global in nature, and he has particular interest in the Asian and North American contexts.

sian.tsuei@gmail.com